Solutions · BMEcat
Have BMEcat errors corrected
You already have a catalogue and know of specific error messages, quality issues or feedback from a recipient. We assess the file, target version and requirements, then define the correction scope before making an offer.
We assess the scope and recipient requirements before making an offer.
You already have a catalogue and know of specific error messages, quality issues or feedback from a recipient. We assess the file, target version and requirements, then define the correction scope before making an offer.
Common starting points
Structure and format
- XML or BMEcat structural errors prevent processing.
Content and mapping
- Required fields, units or references are missing.
- Article identifiers or group relationships are inconsistent.
Recipient / target system
- a customer or data pool reports specific discrepancies.
- existing product data needs correcting or transforming for the catalogue.
What we clarify before an offer
Source data
- BMEcat version, transaction and current file revision
- existing findings or error messages
Scope and prerequisites
- target system, recipient or validation criteria
- number and type of affected articles
- available source data
Acceptance
- desired result and acceptance criteria
Only then are the scope, price and delivery time defined. There is no flat fixed price and no acceptance guarantee.
How this differs from the quality analysis
The BMEcat quality analysis provides findings and priorities but does not correct data. Error correction addresses a known or previously analysed set of problems and is quoted separately.
Possible deliverables
Depending on the agreed scope, the service may include a corrected catalogue, a documented change list, another technical validation or preparation for delivery to a recipient. Only the specific offer is binding.
Item D-52 · Missing length unit · Agreed example scope
- Finding in the source version
- D-52
- Length
- 5
- Unit
- Missing
- Reliable evidence
Approved data sheet D-52, revision 2: length 5 mm. Identifier and revision are unambiguously linked in this example.
- Documented correction
- D-52 · 5 mm
Only the unit is added. The value 5 is retained. Recheck: the length now has its evidenced unit.
The image reference is still missing. No evidence is available for it; no automatic completion. The corrected unit establishes neither catalogue completeness nor recipient acceptance.
Limits
Agreed limits
- no blanket certification or acceptance guarantee
- no correction without sufficiently reliable source data
- no implicit recreation of the entire catalogue
- new file revisions or additional recipient requirements need a fresh assessment
- ongoing operations are only included under a separate managed service agreement
FAQ
Can I purchase error correction directly?
We first review the file, source data and recipient requirements, then provide an individual correction quote. Direct purchase is therefore not available.
Is a quality analysis required first?
Not necessarily. Reliable existing findings can be reviewed. If the starting point is unclear, the quality analysis is the more useful first step.
Does correction guarantee acceptance by my customer?
Only explicitly agreed validation criteria can be part of acceptance. No general recipient approval is promised.
Solutions · BMEcat
Define your task
We assess the scope and recipient requirements before making an offer.